🔗 Share this article

Administration officials confirmed the initiation of government employee terminations on the end of the week, making good on prior threats in response to the continuing federal funding lapse, which is now poised to extend into its third straight week.

Formal Statement and Early Information

Russell Vought wrote on a public platform that “reductions in force have begun,” referring to the government’s procedure for terminating staff.

While Vought provided no details on which departments were impacted, a treasury spokesperson stated that layoff warnings had been issued within that department. Furthermore, a DHS representative indicated that staff reductions would take place at the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency. Also, a union for federal workers announced that employees at the Department of Education would be impacted by the reduction in force.

Union Response and Court Actions

Labor representatives cautions that the layoffs would have “severe consequences” on public services used by the public and vowed to challenge the moves in the legal system.

“It is disgraceful that the government has exploited the funding lapse as an pretext to wrongfully terminate numerous employees who deliver critical services to communities across the country,” stated Everett Kelley, representing the AFGE.

The largest labor federation in the US responded to the news, saying, “Labor organizations will see you in court.”

Political Standoff and Funding Battle

Lawmakers from the Democratic party have declined to support a Republican-backed bill to restore funding unless it contains provisions related to health policy. After repeated failed attempts, the GOP leadership in the Senate have put the chamber in recess until next Tuesday, indicating the deadlock is not expected to be resolved soon.

At a media briefing, the Republican House speaker, the speaker, criticized Senate Democrats for not supporting the GOP proposal, which passed in the House on a largely partisan basis.

“This is the last paycheck that government employees will see until Washington Democrats decide to do their job and end the shutdown,” Johnson stated. “Starting next week, military personnel, who often live paycheck to paycheck, are going to miss a full paycheck.”

Legal and Operational Constraints

Previously, labor groups filed for a temporary restraining order to block the administration from implementing any layoffs during the shutdown. Moreover, a federal judge directed the administration to disclose details on layoff plans, impacted departments, and if any federal employees had been recalled to execute layoffs.

A report argued that a government shutdown limits the authority of the administration to conduct terminations, citing guidance that acknowledged any permanent layoffs need to have been initiated prior to the funding expired.

Impact on Workers

These terminations took place on the same day that government employees got only a partial paycheck covering the final days of the previous month but not the start of the current month, since funding expired at the beginning of the period.

A public service advocate, the president of the non-profit Partnership for Public Service, criticized the gridlock’s effect on federal employees.

This is unjust to make federal employees suffer because our elected officials in Congress and the administration have failed to keep our federal operations open and operational,” the advocate stated. “Our air traffic controllers, veterans’ healthcare providers, smoke jumpers and safety officials are not at fault for this government shutdown.”

The irony is that lawmakers and senior White House leaders are still receiving salaries amid the shutdown.